Difference between revisions of "User talk:Belgianrofliron"
From YTMND
(you're awesome) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Possibly, but don't edit the "Poland" wiki anymore, you don't know about the current trend enough to write a coherent article. Thank you for writing about the history of the original fad, which I will leave intact on the wiki, but that history no longer applies to the topic, as the sites are motivated by different reasons and are made in a very different way. | Possibly, but don't edit the "Poland" wiki anymore, you don't know about the current trend enough to write a coherent article. Thank you for writing about the history of the original fad, which I will leave intact on the wiki, but that history no longer applies to the topic, as the sites are motivated by different reasons and are made in a very different way. | ||
| + | Also I agree entirely that wikipedia takes itself way too seriously, but that a wiki is perfect for a site that is less serious, just to get a bit of information spread around, not to be an empirical source on everything. | ||
Revision as of 18:21, August 12, 2006
I'm awesome, discuss! Belgianrofliron 10:23, July 1, 2006 (CDT)
you're awesome
Possibly, but don't edit the "Poland" wiki anymore, you don't know about the current trend enough to write a coherent article. Thank you for writing about the history of the original fad, which I will leave intact on the wiki, but that history no longer applies to the topic, as the sites are motivated by different reasons and are made in a very different way. Also I agree entirely that wikipedia takes itself way too seriously, but that a wiki is perfect for a site that is less serious, just to get a bit of information spread around, not to be an empirical source on everything.
