Difference between revisions of "User talk:Belgianrofliron"

From YTMND
Jump to: navigation, search
(you're awesome)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Possibly, but don't edit the "Poland" wiki anymore, you don't know about the current trend enough to write a coherent article. Thank you for writing about the history of the original fad, which I will leave intact on the wiki, but that history no longer applies to the topic, as the sites are motivated by different reasons and are made in a very different way.<br>
 
Possibly, but don't edit the "Poland" wiki anymore, you don't know about the current trend enough to write a coherent article. Thank you for writing about the history of the original fad, which I will leave intact on the wiki, but that history no longer applies to the topic, as the sites are motivated by different reasons and are made in a very different way.<br>
 
Also I agree entirely that wikipedia takes itself way too seriously, but that a wiki is perfect for a site that is less serious, just to get a bit of information spread around, not to be an empirical source on everything.
 
Also I agree entirely that wikipedia takes itself way too seriously, but that a wiki is perfect for a site that is less serious, just to get a bit of information spread around, not to be an empirical source on everything.
 +
<br>
 +
I suppose you responded about that last comment and I meant a wiki is perfect for a site such as YTMND, as it is less serious and pretentious.

Revision as of 21:04, August 12, 2006

I'm awesome, discuss! Belgianrofliron 10:23, July 1, 2006 (CDT)

you're awesome

Possibly, but don't edit the "Poland" wiki anymore, you don't know about the current trend enough to write a coherent article. Thank you for writing about the history of the original fad, which I will leave intact on the wiki, but that history no longer applies to the topic, as the sites are motivated by different reasons and are made in a very different way.
Also I agree entirely that wikipedia takes itself way too seriously, but that a wiki is perfect for a site that is less serious, just to get a bit of information spread around, not to be an empirical source on everything.
I suppose you responded about that last comment and I meant a wiki is perfect for a site such as YTMND, as it is less serious and pretentious.